Parisian vs Martinez Analysis and Prediction

Home » MMA Single Fights » Parisian vs Martinez Analysis and Prediction

Parisian vs Martinez Analysis and Prediction

Want to view analysis and predictions for all the match-ups on UFC on ESPN 25?

CLICK HERE

Josh Parisian (13-4) vs Roque Martinez (15-7-2)

Heavyweight (265)

Josh Parisian

Christ alive, losing to Parker Porter is not a blip you want on your record. Possessing a dead man’s footwork, Parisian rock-em sock-ems his way into smothering fighters to the cage and securing top position. Against fighters who push a hard pace, Parisian will struggle, but with Martinez’s funeral pace, Parisian’s power shot only strategy will prosper.

Roque Martinez

Bemusing that the UFC is keeping Martinez around? Surely he has fed enough prospects at this point? Martinez is an alright athlete, contrary to his comical size, but a Heavyweight with powerful hands can’t be so scarce that the UFC needs to keep funnelling Martinez vs prospects into the prelims. Nevertheless, Martinez’s volume and cardio are a-ok.

Predicted Result: Parisian Decision

Martinez, contrary to his comical size, has a decent gas tank and puts out a surprising volume. His mediocre hands will not be enough to stop Josh Parisian from overwhelming him on the feet with power shots. Moreover, Parisian will struggle to find an easier opponent to bully against the fence and eventually smother him from top.

Josh Parisian exhausted himself against the very limited Parker Porter | Parisian vs Martinez
Josh Parisian exhausted himself against the very limited Parker Porter | Parisian vs Martinez

Want to view analysis and predictions for all the match-ups on UFC on ESPN 25?

CLICK HERE


Tipping Jar

Pintsized Interests is just a baby finding its first steps in the big, bad world of sports journalism. If you enjoy the content that is regularly uploaded then please consider donating via the link below. Any amount is greatly appreciated, and will go towards ensuring the survival of Pintsized Interests in the long-term.


Leave a Reply